But there, before me, lay a most stunning scene. As soon as I thought of the word 'stunning', a conversation on the Outdoor Writers and Photographers Guild forum came to mind. When it comes to describing a view, scene or location, do we think about what we're writing? Take 'stunning' as an example. The verb to stun means to "make somebody dazed or briefly unconscious." Hmmm, so if the scene is stunning the person viewing it will be knocked unconscious, if only briefly. Do scenes actually knock people unconscious?
And then there's 'breathtaking'. If views are breathtaking, the mountain tops of the Lake District should be littered with bodies that have had the breath taken from them.
One forum member discussed his hatred of the word 'nestled'. It always annoyed him to read of towns 'nestling' in their surrounding hills. According to two of my dictionaries, to nestle is to settle down snugly or comfortably. How many towns do you see wandering around their locality and then hoisting up their skirts as they wiggle their bums and nestle into the folds of the surrounding land?
In reality, many of these words have become cliches and our use of them is simple laziness. We can't be bothered to come up with something more original. So, next time you find yourself writing a travel article and want to describe the scene in front of you, just stop and think for a moment. Are the words that spring to mind the most appropriate? Do they mean what you think they mean and are you being lazy with your choice of words?
As for my view, well, all I can say is that it was pulchritudinous ;-)
PS - Sally Quilford's excellent blog, Quiller's Place, is hosting an Anti-Conning Writers' Day on 25th March. She's looking for examples of unscrupulous or dubious 'services' that are offered to writers in order to bring these scams to the attention of writers. For more information, visit the post in question here: http://sallyquilfordblog.co.uk/2011/03/anti-conning-writers-day-friday-25th.html